Sunday, November 30, 2025
Whisk(e)y ... Sunday?
Wednesday, November 26, 2025
Whisk(e)y Wednesday - 2025-11-26
Another random blind sample... here we go! Tonight's pour is light in color, so light my first guess is Ardbeg, but I'm getting ahead of myself a bit here. The nose... rubber, sweet bbq, touch of sour malt, campfire, ash, and char. The taste is ash, peat, spicy, hot pepper, sweet bbq meat, and char.
The finish, I get some burnt sugar, hot pepper that is a bit punchy and lingers. More sweet way in the back. Overall, this feels a bit random - the flavors are not overly cohesive. It's still pretty good, and I do expect it to be a one-off Ardbeg, I'll rate it 4.0/5.0 tonight.
And - it was Ardbeg. Scorch Committee Release, 51.7% ABV. I had this during 24 Days of Whisk(e)y in 2021 and rated it 4.0/5.0 that time as well. I did like the Committee release version better than the standard version back then.
Wednesday, November 19, 2025
Whisk(e)y Wednesday - 2025-11-19
Hey... another Whisk(e)y Wednesday - another blind sample, here we go...
On the nose, brown sugar, mint, orange peel, not too sharp on the nose, but it does have some proof. My initial thought here was rye ... but it might be a bourbon. The taste is a bit dusty, sweet upfront, a bit spicy, hot red pepper, the spice builds. I would lean towards bourbon over rye though, it just feels more like bourbon - it does seem to have some proof, I'd guess 110 or so.
The finish I get cherry, wood dryness, cinnamon, medium length and it turns more dry over time. Overall, this is pretty good - I don't have a good guess as to what it could be though as I can't think of anything I saved a sample of that would fall into this category. It's probably a good thing that over time I'll forget what I have saved samples of... will make it more blind (: I'd rate this a 3.5/5.0 tonight.
Turns out it was Baker's 7 Bourbon... which I had not blind a few weeks back when I didn't have enough to save a sample of. I had an older bottle of Baker's from around 2020 ... and I don't know if this sample is from that bottle, or the newer bottle. Either way, I didn't really get the usual Baker's peanut notes while sampling it - it's there if I really go looking for it I guess. I rated both of them 3.75/5.0 initially.
Wednesday, November 12, 2025
Whisk(e)y Wednesday - 2025-11-12
Wednesday, November 5, 2025
Whisk(e)y Wednesday - 2025-11-05
Wednesday, September 17, 2025
Whisk(e)y Wednesday - 2025-09-17
Wednesday, September 10, 2025
Whisk(e)y Wednesday - 2025-09-10
All right - time for another random sample ... see what I think.
This one is quite light - and so right away I'm going to guess it's a Scotch Whisky with no added coloring. The nose I get honey, some ash, a bit of matchstick, very sweet. Chocolate as well. This one seems fairly mild, but I did just come off a warm up pour that was high proof.
There is more ash on the taste, some matchstick as well. It's a bit prickly, and the honey comes through as well. There does seem to be something a little off on it, but I can't really place what exactly - can't seem to pin it down.
The finish has sweet in the front, and turns ashy in the back. It has a touch of malt sourness as well that I sometimes get from more recent Lagavulin Distillers Editions - but I can't see this being that. There is a little bit of pepper on the finish as well. My best guess is this is one of the one-off Ardbegs I've bought over the years.
I'll rate this a 4.0/5.0 ... if I was in the right mood, I'd rate it 4.25. This ended up being the Ardbeg Heavy Vapors Committee Release, 50.2% ABV (which I believe was cask strength for this one). As many of the Ardbeg one-offs, it wasn't cheap - coming in at about $160 in Oregon. It doesn't look like I've reviewed this before - I have a little bit left to try again sometime to see if I like it more or less than this evening. While I don't think I have a sample remaining, I'm pretty certain I prefer Corryvrekan or even Uigedail over this, and those you can find easily and they are cheaper.